On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
A century ago a father and a son
labored to replicate the intricate
structure of nearly eight hundred
species of plants in four thousand
delicate models. Leopold Blaschka
and his son Rudolph were masters
of lampwork, blowing and shaping
glistening molten glass over a torch
of blue flame. Fame came to them
when Harvard University put most
of the collection on permanent display
in its Museum of Natural History.
What was kept locked away were
the monstrous Venturia inaequalis,
Taphrina deformans, and a taste of
Monilinia fructigena, a grotesque
perversion of beauty called fruits
in decay. For a few short months
in the nineteenth year of this,
the third millennium, just before
a worldwide pandemic laid waste
to humans, out came twenty examples
of peach leaf curl, pear scab, brown
rot and a whole pale microcosm
of Aspergillus rising from the cabinet
floor in tiny zombie-flesh trees.
Cryptogamic bodies like ferns, mosses,
algae and fungi spread themselves
around by spore, so more of an orchard
will share an infection, the placards said.
Detection still comes from studying
the spots, dots, desiccations and rot
in this fragile freaks’ gallery, simulacra
of apples sharing a barrel of cultivated
Latin names for diseases at once as old
and relentless as withering time, and yet
with a genius for budding afresh to breed
death in our run-amuck Garden of Eden.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
