Amid political and economic turbulence, few issues have illuminated the fault lines of French governance quite like the highly unpopular pension reform. And the clash goes far beyond policy, it inflamed an already angry and volatile electorate and parliament the moment Macron forced it through with article 49.3. So now why is a reform so central to Macron’s reformist agenda now regarded as the sacrificial lamb that just might be a saving grace to the autumn of his presidency? To answer that question, Eve Irvine is pleased to welcome Renaud Foucart, Economist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Economics at Lancaster University Management School. What does its suspension signal, not only for France’s public finances, but for democracy, trust, and the moral contract binding the state and the citizen? Will France’s fiscal trajectory be cast into limbo: will debt burdens accelerate, will any future reform agendas lose credibility? Whoever governs in 2027 will inherit an escalating budget crisis without any political capital or room to manoeuvre. Mr. Foucart does caution though that postponing action today compounds risk tomorrow.
Trending
- ‘Not clear’ who was behind FCDO hack, says minister, amid reports of China link – UK politics live | Politics
- Seahawks beat Rams in overtime to seal play-off place
- Why British politicians are flocking to American tech giants
- Rams’ Puka Nacua doubles down on referee criticism after one of WR’s best games
- Transfer rumors, news: Man United eye Al Hilal star Neves
- Milwaukee judge found guilty of felony obstruction in helping undocumented man evade arrest
- Trump suspends US green card lottery after Brown University and MIT shootings : NPR
- ChatGPT launches an app store, lets developers know it’s open for business
