Peter Zalmayev, Director of the Eurasia Democracy Initiative, calls the US decision to potentially provide Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine a welcome “escalation”, one that has clearly unsettled Vladimir Putin, even if it may not decisively alter the battlefield. While the symbolism and strategic leverage of such weapons are significant: they could enable Ukraine to carry out asymmetrical warfare, targeting Russia’s oil production and refining capacity, deepening its economic strain. All the while, Putin is biding for time and “being rewarded, unjustly” by Trump, with a meeting in a very symbolic European capital: Budapest, where, “in a cruel twist of irony”, 1994 the US, UK, and Russia guaranteed Ukraine’s security in exchange for nuclear disarmament.
Trending
- How fusion power works and the startups pursuing it
- Amid legal turmoil, Kalshi is temporarily banned in Nevada
- Record Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
- What happened at Nvidia GTC: NemoClaw, Robot Olaf, and a $1 trillion bet
- New court filing reveals Pentagon told Anthropic the two sides were nearly aligned — a week after Trump declared the relationship kaput
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says
- Microsoft rolls back some of its Copilot AI bloat on Windows
