While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- How fusion power works and the startups pursuing it
- Amid legal turmoil, Kalshi is temporarily banned in Nevada
- Record Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
- What happened at Nvidia GTC: NemoClaw, Robot Olaf, and a $1 trillion bet
- New court filing reveals Pentagon told Anthropic the two sides were nearly aligned — a week after Trump declared the relationship kaput
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says
- Microsoft rolls back some of its Copilot AI bloat on Windows
