While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- How Iran Accumulated 11 Tons of Enriched Uranium
- Scientists Solve ‘Golden Orb’ Mystery
- This Parrot Has No Beak, But Is at the Top of the Pecking Order
- WhatsApp is testing a premium subscription, put it is mainly cosmetic
- Palantir posts mini-manifesto denouncing inclusivity and ‘regressive’ cultures
- Robots beat human records at Beijing half-marathon
- Blue Origin’s New Glenn put a customer satellite in the wrong orbit during its third launch
- OpenAI’s existential questions | TechCrunch
