While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- Paul vs Joshua: Briton wins in sixth round of heavyweight mismatch
- Epstein files released so far show little to support allegations of previously unknown accomplices
- Ex-Splunk execs’ startup Resolve AI hits $1 billion valuation with Series A
- Where to watch Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua fight: Start time, live stream
- U.S. launches strikes in Syria targeting Islamic State fighters : NPR
- Sources: Rockets owners expand talks to buy, move Sun
- Prime minister backs NSW premier’s call for a royal commission into the Bondi beach terror attack | Australian politics
- Sequoia partner spreads debunked Brown shooting theory, testing new leadership
