While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- Anthropic raises $13B Series F at $183B valuation
- Her reaction to learning her bestie is also pregnant
- No, Area 53-Year-Old Would Not Like His Drink With Boba
- Strategy (MSTR) Raises STRC Dividend to 10% to Boost Demand for the Preferred Stock
- “America's Got Talent” former child contestant returns as adult, competing at 8 months pregnant
- Transfer rumors, news: Man United already working on Baleba deal
- Google will reveal its Gemini smart home plans (and hardware) next month
- Stock futures edge higher after Google avoids harsh antitrust penalty: Live updates – CNBC