While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- Top Democrat slams justice department plan to hold back some Epstein files despite today’s deadline – live | Donald Trump
- Known uses voice AI to help you go on more in-person dates
- Guardiola says ‘no discussions’ about City exit amid Maresca speculation: football – live | Premier League
- WATCH: ABC News talks to Russians about Ukraine war
- Hacks, thefts and disruption: The worst data breaches of 2025
- Von Miller says playing so well at his age is a ‘dope accomplishment’
- Common holiday scams and how to avoid them : NPR
- ‘Not clear’ who was behind FCDO hack, says minister, amid reports of China link – UK politics live | Politics
