While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says
- Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says
- Microsoft rolls back some of its Copilot AI bloat on Windows
- WordPress.com now lets AI agents write and publish posts, and more
- The best AI investment might be in energy tech
- Polymarket continues its partnership spree with a Major League Baseball deal
- Jeff Bezos reportedly wants $100 billion to buy and transform old manufacturing firms with AI
- Amazon acquires Rivr, maker of a stair-climbing delivery robot
